
Braak, S.W. van den (2010, March 15). Sensemaking software for crime analysis. UU Universiteit Utrecht (248 pag.) ( Utrecht University). Prom./coprom.: prof. dr. J-J.Ch. Meyer, prof. dr. mr. H. Prakken, dr. H. van Oostendorp & dr. G.A.W. Vreeswijk. Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Representing causal knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. UU-CS 2008-24. onbekend: UU WINFI Informatica en Informatiekunde. Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. In E. Francesconi, G. Sartor & D. Tiscornia (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. {JURIX 2008}: The Twenty-First Annual Conference Vol. 189. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp. 160-169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2008). The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner & F.J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences - {ICLS} 2008 (pp. 3-1443145). Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2008). Utilizing compression and refinement to handle large cases in crime analysis. In F. Grasso, N. Green, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the {ECAI}-06 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument ({CMNA}-06} (pp. 60-67). Braak, S.W. van den, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2007). AVERs: An argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 11-15). New York: ACM Press. Bex, F.J., Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H., Verheij, B. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probablity and Risk, 6(1-4), 145-168. Bex, F.J., Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H., Verheij, B. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? In M.M. Dastani & E. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 311-312). Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). A critical review of argument visualization tools: Do users become better reasoners? In F. Grasso, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the ECAI-06 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA-06 (pp. 67-75). Braak, S.W. van den & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). A knowledge representation architecture for the construction of stories based on interpretation and evidence. In F. Grasso, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the ECAI-2006 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA VI) (pp. 76-82). Riva del Garda, Italy. Braak, S.W. van den & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning. In T.M. van Engers (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (pp. 151-156). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.