HOME cs.uu.nl home education contact library calendar search UU.NL
about us research people archive services jobs

publications by dr. S.W. van den Braak

Susan van den Braak

dr. S.W. van den Braak

some publications

Braak, S.W. van den (2010, March 15). Sensemaking software for crime analysis. UU Universiteit Utrecht (248 pag.) ( Utrecht University). Prom./coprom.: prof. dr. J-J.Ch. Meyer, prof. dr. mr. H. Prakken, dr. H. van Oostendorp & dr. G.A.W. Vreeswijk.

Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Representing causal knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. UU-CS 2008-24. onbekend: UU WINFI Informatica en Informatiekunde.

Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. In E. Francesconi, G. Sartor & D. Tiscornia (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. {JURIX 2008}: The Twenty-First Annual Conference Vol. 189. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp. 160-169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.

Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2008). The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner & F.J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences - {ICLS} 2008 (pp. 3-1443145).

Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2008). Utilizing compression and refinement to handle large cases in crime analysis. In F. Grasso, N. Green, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the {ECAI}-06 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument ({CMNA}-06} (pp. 60-67).

Braak, S.W. van den, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2007). AVERs: An argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 11-15). New York: ACM Press.

Bex, F.J., Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H., Verheij, B. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probablity and Risk, 6(1-4), 145-168.

Bex, F.J., Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H., Verheij, B. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? In M.M. Dastani & E. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 311-312).

Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). A critical review of argument visualization tools: Do users become better reasoners? In F. Grasso, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the ECAI-06 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA-06 (pp. 67-75).

Braak, S.W. van den & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). A knowledge representation architecture for the construction of stories based on interpretation and evidence. In F. Grasso, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the ECAI-2006 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA VI) (pp. 76-82). Riva del Garda, Italy.

Braak, S.W. van den & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning. In T.M. van Engers (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (pp. 151-156). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.


valid-html401 webmaster@cs.uu.nl, Tue, 22 May 2012 11:31:26 +0200 ← Departement Informatica, Universiteit Utrecht